Author:
Pérez Jolles Mónica,Fernández María E.,Jacobs Gabrielle,De Leon Jessenia,Myrick Leslie,Aarons Gregory A.
Abstract
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are defined as traumatic events occurring before age 18, such as maltreatment, life-threatening accidents, harsh migration experiences, or violence. Screening for ACEs includes asking questions about an individual's early exposure to these types of events. ACEs screenings have potential value in identifying children exposed to chronic and significant stress that produces elevated cortisol levels (i.e., toxic stress), and its associated physical and mental health conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, depression, asthma, ADHD, anxiety, and substance dependence. However, ACEs screenings are seldom used in primary care settings. The Surgeon General of California has addressed this care gap by introducing ACEs Aware, an ACEs screening fee-for-service healthcare policy signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom. Since January 2020, Medi-Cal, California's Medicaid health care program, has reimbursed primary care providers for using the Pediatric ACEs and Related Life-events Screener (PEARLS) tool to screen children and adults for ACEs during wellness visits. To achieve the goals set by the ACEs Aware state policy, it is essential to develop and test implementation strategies that are informed by the values, priorities, and resources of clinical settings, healthcare professionals, and end-users. To address this need, we partnered with a system of federally qualified health centers in Southern California on a pilot study to facilitate the implementation of ACEs screenings in five community-based clinics. The health centers had broad ideas for an implementation strategy, as well as best practices to improve adoption of screenings, such as focusing on staff training to improve clinic workflow. This knowledge was incorporated into the development of an implementation strategy template, used at the outset of this study. We used the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework to guide the study and inform a participatory planning process called Implementation Mapping. In this paper, we describe how Implementation Mapping was used to engage diverse stakeholders and guide them through a systematic process that resulted in the development of the implementation strategy. We also detail how the EPIS framework informed each Implementation Mapping Task and provide recommendations for developing implementation strategies using EPIS and Implementation Mapping in health-care settings.
Funder
National Institute of Mental Health
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference42 articles.
1. The Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Nationally, By State, By Race or Ethnicity.2018
2. Adverse childhood experiences in non-westernized nations: implications for immigrant and refugee health;Solberg;J Immigr Minor Health.,2020
3. Adverse childhood experiences among low-income, latinx children in immigrant families: comparison of children in rural farmworker and urban non-farmworker communities;Dobbins,2021
4. Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): cautions and suggestions;Finkelhor;Child Abuse Negl.,2018
5. Improving the adverse childhood experiences study scale;Finkelhor;JAMA Pediatr.,2013