Author:
Dodson Elizabeth A.,Parks Renee G.,Jacob Rebekah R.,An Ruopeng,Eyler Amy A.,Lee Nathan,Morshed Alexandra B.,Politi Mary C.,Tabak Rachel G.,Yan Yan,Brownson Ross C.
Abstract
IntroductionEvidence-based policies are a powerful tool for impacting health and addressing obesity. Effectively communicating evidence to policymakers is critical to ensure evidence is incorporated into policies. While all public health is local, limited knowledge exists regarding effective approaches for improving local policymakers' uptake of evidence-based policies.MethodsLocal policymakers were randomized to view one of four versions of a policy brief (usual care, narrative, risk-framing, and narrative/risk-framing combination). They then answered a brief survey including questions about their impressions of the brief, their likelihood of using it, and how they determine legislative priorities.ResultsResponses from 331 participants indicated that a majority rated local data (92%), constituent needs/opinions (92%), and cost-effectiveness data (89%) as important or very important in determining what issues they work on. The majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that briefs were understandable (87%), believable (77%), and held their attention (74%) with no brief version rated significantly higher than the others. Across the four types of briefs, 42% indicated they were likely to use the brief. Logistic regression models showed that those indicating that local data were important in determining what they work on were over seven times more likely to use the policy brief than those indicating that local data were less important in determining what they work on (aOR = 7.39, 95% CI = 1.86,52.57).DiscussionAmong local policymakers in this study there was no dominant format or type of policy brief; all brief types were rated similarly highly. This highlights the importance of carefully crafting clear, succinct, credible, and understandable policy briefs, using different formats depending on communication objectives. Participants indicated a strong preference for receiving materials incorporating local data. To ensure maximum effect, every effort should be made to include data relevant to a policymaker's local area in policy communications.
Funder
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Cancer Institute
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital
Reference46 articles.
1. Overweight & Obesity. Why it Matters2022
2. Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes;Brownson;Am J Prev Med.,2006
3. Communicating evidence-based information on cancer prevention to state-level policy makers;Brownson;J Natl Cancer Inst.,2011
4. Ten great public health achievements–United States, 1900-1999;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,1999
5. The importance of policy change for addressing public health problems;Pollack Porter;Public Health Rep.,2018