Investigating the involvement of cognitive control processes in innovative and adaptive creativity and their age-related changes
-
Published:2023-02-02
Issue:
Volume:17
Page:
-
ISSN:1662-5161
-
Container-title:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Author:
Nagy Boglárka,Czigler István,Csizmadia Petra,File Domonkos,Fáy Nóra,Gaál Zsófia Anna
Abstract
IntroductionBased on the two-factor model of creativity, two distinct types of creative problem solving can be differentiated: innovative (“do things differently”) and adaptive (“do things better”). Flexible cognitive control is a crucial concept in connection with both general and specific styles of creativity: innovative problem-solving benefits from broader attention and flexible mental set shifting; while adaptive creativity relies on focused attention and persistent goal-oriented processes. We applied an informatively cued task-switching paradigm which is suitable for measuring different cognitive control processes and mechanisms like proactive and reactive control. We hypothesized that adaptive creativity is connected to effective proactive control processes, while innovative creativity is based on reactive task-execution. As we have found no previous evidence how age-related changes in cognitive control affects creative cognition; we also examined the effect of healthy aging on different problem-solving styles in an explorative way.MethodsOur participants, 37 younger (18–30 years) and 37 older (60–75 years) adults, were divided into innovative and adaptive creative groups according to the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking’s Figural Subtest (Hungarian version).ResultsOur results showed that among younger adults the adaptively creative group had larger cue-locked CNV component (effective preparatory activity connected to proactive control), while the innovatively creative group had a larger target-locked P3b component (effective target evaluation and categorization in line with reactive control) which supports a functional difference in the two creative styles. By contrast, in older adults innovative problem-solving showed larger mixing costs (less effective maintenance and selection of task sets), and the lack of trial type effect on target-locked N2b (target-induced goal reactivation and less effective conflict resolution); while adaptive problem-solving caused them to make fewer errors (accuracy-oriented behavior).DiscussionAll in all, innovative and adaptive creativity is based on distinct cognitive control mechanisms in both age-groups, but their processing level is affected by age-related changes.
Funder
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference119 articles.
1. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations;Amabile;Research in organizational behavior,1988
2. Is creativity domain specific?;Baer;Cambridge handbook of creativity,2010
3. The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity.;Baer;Roeper Rev.,2015
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献