Microscopic Transsphenoidal Resection of Giant Pituitary Adenomas: Analysis of the Factors Limiting the Degree of Resection in 73 Cases

Author:

Pei Zhijie,Wang Jiaxing,Mu Shuwen,Feng Tianshun,Wang Meina,Yu Shentong,Wei Liangfeng,Fang Yi,Wang Shousen

Abstract

PurposeTo analyze the risk factors affecting the gross-total resection of giant pituitary adenomas using a transsphenoidal approach under a microscope to provide a reference basis for formulating an appropriate surgical strategy.MethodsThe clinical data of patients who underwent microscopic transsphenoidal resection of giant pituitary adenomas in a single center from January 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on magnetic resonance imaging and surgical records, the predictive factors affecting the gross-total resection of giant pituitary adenomas under microscopy were determined through univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsA total of 73 patients with giant pituitary adenomas underwent transsphenoidal microsurgery. Gross-total resection was performed in 19 cases (26%), subtotal resection in 31 cases (42%), partial resection in 21 cases (29%), and the degree of resection was <50% in only two cases (3%). After binary logistic analysis, it was found that it was more difficult to completely remove giant pituitary adenomas with a Knosp grade 3–4 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.214, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05–0.917; P = 0.038], greater proportion of tumor suprasellar volume (odds ratio = 0.937, 95% confidence interval: 0.898–0.978; P = 0.003), and intraoperative evidence of invasion of the cavernous sinus (odds ratio = 0.187, 95% CI: 0.039–0.898; P = 0.036).ConclusionIt is difficult to remove a giant pituitary adenoma invading the cavernous sinus completely with a higher degree of invasion of the suprasellar region using microscopic transsphenoidal surgery. The combined application of multiple surgical methods can help to improve the degree of resection during a single operation.

Funder

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province

Fujian Medical University

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3