Comparison of vacuum pressures and suction forces generated by different pump systems for aspiration thrombectomy

Author:

Kim Sum,Lee Jong Young

Abstract

ObjectiveAspiration thrombectomy is used to treat endovascular stroke treatment by clot removal through vacuum and suction forces. We aimed to investigate the pressures and suction forces generated by different pump systems for aspiration.MethodsVacuum pressure was measured using a vacuum gauge with a closed tip for a 60cc syringe and aspiration pumps. Using an artificial thrombus made from polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel and latex membrane, we assessed the catheter tip force generated on an artificial thrombus using 5Fr Sofia and 6Fr Sofia PLUS intermediate catheters combined with Penumbra Jet Engine or Stryker Medela AXS Universal Aspiration Set. Subsequently, we calculated the catheter tip forces based on the pressure [catheter tip size (force = area × pressure)], and compared with the measured catheter tip force.ResultsThe 60cc syringe generated the highest vacuum pressure. Among the automatic pumps, the Penumbra jet engine generated the highest vacuum pressure. The catheter tip forces on the artificial thrombus and latex membrane were 18.5 ± 1.70 and 8.0 ± 1.23 gf, respectively, and 13.9 ± 1.37 and 5.6 ± 0.83 gf, respectively using the 5 Fr Sofia with the Penumbra Jet Engine and the Stryker Medela AXS Universal Aspiration Set, respectively. The corresponding values for the 6 Fr Sofia PLUS with the Penumbra Jet Engine and Stryker Medela AXS Universal Aspiration Set were 39.7 ± 3.88 and 20.7 ± 0.92 gf and 25.4 ± 4.96 and 18.0 ± 0.84 gf. For a constant catheter diameter and the automatic pump, the catheter tip force was significantly larger in the artificial thrombus than latex membrane (p < 0.001, ANOVA).ConclusionThe catheter diameter, vacuum pressure, and clot softness are positively correlated with the catheter tip force.

Funder

Korea Medical Device Development Fund

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3