Don’t overthink it: The paradoxical nature of expertise for the detection of errors in conceptual business process models

Author:

Boutin Karl-David,Davis Christopher,Hevner Alan,Léger Pierre-Majorique,Labonte-LeMoyne Elise

Abstract

Business process models are widely used artifacts in design activities to facilitate communication about business domains and processes. Despite being an extensively researched topic, some aspects of conceptual business modeling are yet to be fully explored and understood by academicians and practitioners alike. We study the attentional characteristics specific to experts and novices in a semantic and syntactic error detection task across 75 Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) models. We find several intriguing results. Experts correctly identify more error-free models than novices, but also tend to find more false positive defects. Syntactic errors are diagnosed faster than semantic errors by both groups. Both groups spend more time on error-free models. Our findings regarding the ambiguous differences between experts and novices highlight the paradoxical nature of expertise and the need to further study how best to train business analysts to design and evaluate conceptual models.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Neuroscience

Reference96 articles.

1. When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise.;Adelson;J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.,1984

2. The influence of business managers’ IT competence on championing IT.;Bassellier;Inf. Syst. Res.,2003

3. A systematic literature review on the usage of eye-tracking in understanding process models.;Batista Duarte;Bus. Process Manag. J.,2021

4. Comparing representations with relational and EER Models.;Batra;Commun. ACM,1990

5. Identifying the weaknesses of UML class diagrams during data model comprehension;Bavota;Proceeding of the international conference on model driven engineering languages and systems (MODELS 2011),2011

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3