Author:
Georgiev Dejan,Christie Rosie,Torkamani Mariam,Song Ruifeng,Limousin Patricia,Jahanshahi Marjan
Abstract
Habits are defined as automatic behaviours triggered by cues and performed without awareness. They are difficult to control and mentally efficient, which contrasts with goal-directed behaviour, which is characterised by active thought, high computational effort, and the ability to modify this behaviour in response to a changing environment and contextual demands. Habits are not only defined by the frequency with which a behaviour is performed but represent a complex construct that also includes the strength and automaticity of the habitual behaviour. We report here the development and validation of a Daily Habit Scale (DHS) to assess the frequency, automaticity, and strength of daily habits in healthy individuals. Item reduction based on factor analysis resulted in a scale with 38 items grouped into eight factors explaining 52.91% of the variance. The DHS showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.738) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.892, p<0.001) as well as convergent and divergent reliability compared to other scales measuring habits. We found a significant effect of age, gender, anxiety, and depression on the DHS. Considering certain limitations of the DHS, such as not considering the context of performance of habits, and the absence of certain items, such as transportation use, the results of this study suggest that DHS is a reliable and valid measure of daily habits that can be used by both clinicians and researchers as a measure of daily habits.
Reference61 articles.
1. Predicting behavior from actions in the past : repeated decision making or a matter of habit?;Aarts;J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.,1998
2. Impairments in goal-directed actions predict treatment response to cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder.;Alvares;PLoS One,2014
3. Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action.;Balleine;Neuropsychopharmacology,2010
4. The four horsemen of automaticity: intention, awareness, efficiency, and control as separate issues;Bargh;Handbook of Social Cognition,1994
5. Automaticity in social psychology;Bargh;Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles,1996
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献