Author:
Church Dawson,Stapleton Peta,Vasudevan Anitha,O'Keefe Tom
Abstract
BackgroundSince the turn of the century, Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) has come into widespread use in medical and psychological treatment settings. It is also used as self-help by tens of millions of people each year. Clinical EFT, the manualized form of the method, has been validated as an “evidence-based” practice using criteria published by the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 12 Task Force on Empirically Validated Therapies. Its three essential ingredients are exposure, cognitive framing, and acupressure.ObjectivesIn 2013 we published a paper defining Clinical EFT and reviewing published research. It has been viewed or downloaded over 36,000 times, indicating widespread interest in this treatment modality. Here we update our findings based on subsequently published literature and propose directions for future research.MethodWe performed a systematic review of the literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses. Retrieval of 4,167 results resulted in the identification of 56 RCTs (n = 2,013), 41 of which were published subsequent to our earlier review, as well as eight meta-analyses.ResultsRCTs have found EFT treatment to be effective for (a) psychological conditions such as anxiety, depression, phobias, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); (b) physiological issues such as pain, insomnia, and autoimmune conditions; (c) professional and sports performance; and (d) biological markers of stress. Meta-analyses evaluating the effect of EFT treatment have found it to be “moderate” to “large.” Successful independent replication studies have been carried out for anxiety, depression, PTSD, phobias, sports performance, and cortisol levels. We outline the next steps in EFT research. These include determining its impact on cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and cognitive impairment; analysis of the large-scale datasets made possible by mobile apps; and delivery through channels such as virtual practitioner sessions, artificial intelligence agents, online courses, apps, virtual reality platforms, and standardized group therapy.ConclusionsSubsequent research has confirmed the conclusions of earlier studies. These find Clinical EFT to be efficacious for a range of psychological and physiological conditions. Comparatively few treatment sessions are required, treatment is effective whether delivered in person or virtually, and symptom improvements persist over time. Treatment is associated with measurable biological effects in the dimensions of gene expression, brain synchrony, hormonal synthesis, and a wide range of biomarkers. Clinical EFT is a stable and mature method with an extensive evidence base. Its use in primary care settings as a safe, rapid, reliable, and effective treatment for both psychological and medical diagnoses continues to grow.
Reference186 articles.
1. The effect of emotional freedom technique (EFT) therapy on the reduction of aggression in single mothers;Abdi;Appl. Math. Eng. Manage. Technol.,2015
2. Randomised controlled study comparing two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: emotional freedom technique (EFT) vs. narrative exposure therapy (NET);Al-Hadethe;J. Traumatic Stress Disord. Treat.,2015
3. Psychological Treatments. APA Division 12, Society of Clinical Psychology2021
4. Does combining emotional freedom techniques and hypnosis have an effect on sexual assault-specific posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms?;Anderson;Energy Psychol. Theory Res. Treat.,2019
5. Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) effects on psychoimmunological factors of chemically pulmonary injured veterans;Babamahmoodi;Iran. J. Allergy Asthma Immunol.,2015