Author:
Giorgetta Cinzia,Strappini Francesca,Capuozzo Alessandra,Evangelista Elisa,Magno Antonella,Castelfranchi Cristiano,Mancini Francesco
Abstract
IntroductionGuilt, shame, and embarrassment represent affective experiences with social implications and diverse self-relevant negative affect. While the distinction between these emotion terms has been extensively investigated, little is known about how they diverge and are related to each other and their crosscultural differences.MethodsHere, we used a community sample (N = 163) comprised of Americans and Italians and a scenario-based measure in which we asked participants to report the intensity of emotions that the story’s main character would feel. The elements used to build the scenarios were based on a recent theoretical approach that proposes distinguishing cognitive, somatic, interoceptive, and behavioral ingredients to differentiate between these emotions. We hypothesized that these ingredients might effectively elicit the target emotions and that the main differences across these cultures would be associated with the emotion terms of shame/vergogna.ResultsOur findings suggest that these defining elements are effective in evoking experiences of guilt, shame, and embarrassment. Moreover, we found that shame was equally elicited by the Shame and Guilt Scenarios only in the American sample, thus suggesting a proximity between shame and guilt in the American sample compared to the Italian’s terms of vergogna and colpa.DiscussionThese results suggest important implications for the psychology of moral emotions and highlight the importance of taking into account some cognitive factors, such as the quality of self-evaluation, the discrepancy between the actual self and the ideal self vs. the sense of perceived responsibility, and the different domains related to self-esteem.
Reference140 articles.
1. Shifting politics in Bedouin love poetry;Abu-Lughod,1990
2. The twenty-item Toronto alexithymia scale—II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity;Bagby;J. Psychosom. Res.,1994
3. Maintaining a focus on the social goals underling self-conscious emotions;Baldwin;Psychol. Inq.,2004
4. A functionalist approach to shame and guilt;Barrett,1995
5. Feelings of shame, embarrassment and guilt and their neural correlates: a systematic review;Bastin;Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.,2016