Author:
Almondes Katie Moraes de,Bizarro Lisiane,Miyazaki Maria Cristina Oliveira Santos,Soares Maria Rita Zoéga,Peuker Ana Carolina,Teodoro Maycoln,Modesto João Gabriel,Veraksa Aleksander N.,Singh Purnima,Han Buxin,Sodi Tholene
Abstract
The BRICS Forum, an independent international organization encouraging commercial, political, and cultural cooperation between Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, was formed in 2011, and these countries have a significant influence on their regional affairs. These nations were hit by COVID-19 at different times, and all adopted home quarantine to reduce the spread of the virus. We present a comparative analysis of actions of psychology and potential outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS nations regarding five aspects: psychology in health policies, social roles of psychology, socioeconomic context, actions for the general population, and health professionals during stage 1 of the pandemic, and possible actions in stage 2. Various types of actions were taken by psychologists in BRICS, with different levels of coordinated cooperation with respective governmental and non-governmental organizations, multiple and parallel efforts from different scientific societies, and professional regulatory agencies. Scientific societies have had an important role in coordinating some of these efforts, especially because they congregate the psychologists from different parts of these countries, improving communication and access to key information. The aim of these actions varies from improving situational skills and competences to increase the accessibility of psychological services and provide psychoeducation and telepsychology. We will consider the social importance of these actions within these countries as a global opportunity for psychology to stage in a complex context involving human health. The way psychology in BRICS will face this challenging situation is likely to produce important regional influence, stimulate scientific contribution, and increase the accessibility of psychology.
Reference64 articles.
1. 2020
2. Trends in mental health inequalities in England during a period of recession, austerity and welfare reform 2004 to 2013;Barr;Soc. Sci. Med.,2015
3. Using social and behavioural science to support Covid-19 pandemic response;Bavel,2020
4. Coronavirus ‘Could Wipe Out Brazil's Indigenous People'2020
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献