Author:
Blything Liam P.,Järvikivi Juhani,Toth Abigail G.,Arnhold Anja
Abstract
Using visual world eye-tracking, we examined whether adults (N = 58) and children (N = 37; 3;1–6;3) use linguistic focussing devices to help resolve ambiguous pronouns. Participants listened to English dialogues about potential referents of an ambiguous pronoun he. Four conditions provided prosodic focus marking to the grammatical subject or to the object, which were either additionally it-clefted or not. A reference condition focussed neither the subject nor object. Adult online data revealed that linguistic focussing via prosodic marking enhanced subject preference, and overrode it in the case of object focus, regardless of the presence of clefts. Children’s processing was also influenced by prosodic marking; however, their performance across conditions showed some differences from adults, as well as a complex interaction with both their memory and language skills. Offline interpretations showed no effects of focus in either group, suggesting that while multiple cues are processed, subjecthood and first mention dominate the final interpretation in cases of conflict.
Reference121 articles.
1. The role of cognitive accessibility in children’s referential choice;Allen;The Acquisition of Reference. Trends in Language Acquisition Research,2015
2. The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract grammatical construction.;Ambridge;Cogn. Dev.,2006
3. Subject-object asymmetries in the acquisition of clefts;Aravind;Proceedings of the 40th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 40),2016
4. Children’s processing of morphosyntactic and prosodic cues in overriding context-based hypotheses: An eyetracking study.;Armstrong;Probus,2016
5. Prosodic focus marking in clefts and syntactically unmarked equivalents: Prosody – syntax trade-off or additive effects?;Arnhold;J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,2021
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献