Author:
Buening Rebecca,Maeda Takuya,Liew Kongmeng,Aramaki Eiji
Abstract
Previous studies have highlighted the communicative limitations of artistic visualizations, which are often too conceptual or interpretive to enhance public understanding of (and volition to act upon) scientific climate information. This seems to suggest a need for greater factuality/concreteness in artistic visualization projects, which may indeed be the case. However, in this paper, we synthesize insights from environmental psychology, the psychology of art, and intermediate disciplines like eco-aesthetics, to argue that artworks—defined by their counterfactual qualities—can be effective for stimulating elements of environmental consciousness. We also argue that different artworks may yield different effects depending on how they combine counter/factual strategies. In so doing, we assert that effective artistic perceptualization—here expressed asaffectivization—exceeds the faithful translation of facts from one mode to another, and cannot be encapsulated in a single example of un/successful art.
Reference77 articles.
1. AnaniaB In Ethiopia, artists protect the environment through “plant graffiti”. 2021
2. Localizing climate change: Nordic homeowners' interpretations of visual representations for climate adaptation;Ballantyne;Environ. Commun,2018
3. “Climate change visualization: using 3D imagery of local places to build capacity and inform policy,”6573 BurchS. ShawA. SheppardS. FlandersD. State of Climate Visualization (Report 09:04)2009
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献