Author:
Chaguendo-Quintero Maria Antonia,Quintero-Monjes Daniela,Cuervo Maria Teresa,Sanabria-Mazo Juan P.
Abstract
BackgroundThe growth of the prison population and the high recidivism rates of inmates represent a major public safety problem.ObjectiveThis systematic review explored executive functions in inmates convicted of violent behavior compared with inmates convicted of non-violent behavior and healthy controls (HCs).MethodsSystematic searches were carried out using five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Embase) until March 6th, 2023. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, two reviewers independently performed the screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment of the 8 studies included. The protocol of this study was registered in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), under registration number CRD42021252043.ResultsConsistently, inmates convicted of violent behavior exhibited a greater alteration in inhibition than inmates convicted of non-violent behavior (four out of four studies) and HCs (two out of two studies). In addition, inmates convicted of violent behavior showed greater impairments in cognitive flexibility (two out of three studies) and working memory (two out of three studies) than HCs. Although with limited evidence (only one study), they also showed worse performance in set shifting and planning than HCs.ConclusionThis study provides evidence of alterations in inhibition in inmates convicted of violent behavior compared to inmates convicted of non-violent behavior and HCs. Even though inmates convicted of violent behavior showed greater impairments in planning and set shifting than HCs, these findings were supported in only one study. In general, more robust evidence is needed to confirm alterations in inmates convicted due to violent behavior. These findings highlight the importance of designing and promoting specific cognitive interventions that contribute to the reintegration of inmates into society.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021252043, identifier CRD42021252043.
Reference64 articles.
1. When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias;Albers;J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.,2018
2. Desempeño de la función ejecutiva por áreas, en internos condenados por homicidio involuntario y doloso;Alvarado-Grijalba;Arch. Neurosci.,2020
3. Propuesta de rehabilitación neuropsicológica de la atención, las funciones ejecutivas y empatía en personas con diagnóstico de trastorno antisocial de la personalidad, desvinculadas del conflicto armado colombiano;Álvis;Rev. Virt. Univer. Católica del Norte,2014
4. Bias analysis for uncontrolled confounding in the health sciences;Arah;Annu. Rev. Public Health,2017
5. Alteración de las funciones ejecutivas en personas vinculadas al conflicto armado colombiano;Arana;Katharsis,2013