Author:
Molina Isaac,Molina-Perez Edmundo,Sobrino Fernanda,Tellez-Rojas Mario Arturo,Zamora-Maldonado Hilda C.,Plaza-Ferreira María,Orozco Yessica,Espinoza-Juarez Victor,Serra-Barragán Luis,De Unanue Adolfo
Abstract
IntroductionThis article presents a systematic literature review that follows the PRISMA and PICOS guidelines to analyze current research trends on cognition, integrative complexity (IC) (a cognitive feature focusing on information processing in a person’s response rather than its quantity or quality), and decision-making from the perspectives of activity theory and neuroscience.MethodsThe study examines 31 papers published between 2012 and 2022 and 19 articles specifically related to neuroscience. We performed a content analysis using six categories within activity theory: subjects, objects, rules, community, division of labor, and outcomes.ResultsThe study investigates the relationship between decision-making outcomes and IC as a cognitive feature in various contexts. Additionally, content analysis on neuroscience and IC revealed significant research gaps, including understanding the nature of IC, challenges related to its measurement, and differentiation from other cognitive features. We also identify opportunities for investigating the brain’s activity during decision-making in relation to IC.DiscussionWe address the need for a more precise categorization of IC in studies of cognition, IC, and decision-making. We discuss the implications of our analysis for understanding the cognitive nature of IC and the potential of neuroscience methods for studying this attribute.
Reference83 articles.
1. Accountable for what? The effect of accountability standard specification on decision-making behavior in the public sector.;Aleksovska;Public Perform. Manag. Rev.,2021
2. The personalities of presidents as independent variables.;Arana;Polit. Psychol.,2021
3. Decision making and demographics: A study of academicians in Indian universities.;Baba;J. Organ. Hum. Behav.,2018
4. Coding manual for conceptual/integrative complexity;Baker-Brown;Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis,2008
5. Majority and minority subgroup argumentation messages.;Beck;Commun. Rep.,2019