Communication with cancer patients: the perspective of caregivers versus non-caregivers in Iran

Author:

Naghavi Azam,Salimi Samaneh,Rief Winfried,von Blanckenburg Pia

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study investigated and compared the attitudes of healthy Iranian individuals (n = 302) in forms of two groups of caregivers and non-caregivers of cancer patients about the communication with cancer patients, and their personal wish to know the diagnosis if they ever had cancer. In addition, this study aimed to identify how many participants in the caregivers’ group had spoken with their family member affected by cancer about their illness.MethodsCaregivers (50.7%) and non-caregivers (49.3%) responded to two questionnaires regarding their general attitudes about communicating with cancer patients, and their willingness to know about their illness if they had cancer.ResultsThe majority of participants (92.8%), especially in the caregiver group, agreed with the right of patients to know the diagnosis and prognosis, and also wished to know if they ever had cancer. However, around 64% of caregivers never talked about cancer with the affected patients.ConclusionParticipants generally believed that patients have the right to know the diagnosis and prognosis, and they also wished to know if they ever had cancer. However, in reality many cancer patients are not included in communication sessions in Iran. Health professionals should focus on how to create a balance between medical bioethics with cultural influences on communication with patients.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Psychology

Reference38 articles.

1. Breaking bad news protocol for cancer disclosure: an Iranian version;Abazari;J Med Ethics Hist Med,2017

2. SPIKES—a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer;Baile;Oncologist,2000

3. Delivering bad news to patients: survey of physicians, patients, and their family members’ attitudes;Bazrafshan;Shiraz E-Medical Journal,2022

4. Breaking bad news: a valid concern among clinicians;Biazar;Iran. J. Psychiatry,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3