Women’s and men’s experiences with participative decision-making at workplace and organizational levels

Author:

Plückelmann Clara,Gustafsson Sendén Marie,Bernhard-Oettel Claudia,Leineweber Constanze,Sczesny Sabine

Abstract

IntroductionThe concept of participative decision-making (PDM) has been well established as a positive organizational factor, and has recently gained attention as a measure of gender inclusivity in the workplace. However, findings regarding gender differences in the experiences of PDM are inconclusive. This study hypothesized that women perceive themselves as less influential than men at the organizational level rather than at the workplace level. Furthermore, the study explored whether these assumed gender differences depend on the gender typicality of occupational positions and professions. We expected gender differences to be more pronounced for male-typed positions and professions (e.g., leadership, engineer) compared to non-male-typed occupational positions and professions (e.g., non-leadership, nurse).MethodsData on experiences with participative decision-making at the workplace and organizational levels were drawn from a large representative Swedish survey (N = 10,500; 60% women).ResultsResults showed that women experienced being less influential than men at the organizational level, whereas the experiences of women and men did not differ at the workplace level. The gender difference at the organizational level was not related to the gender typicality of position and profession.DiscussionThe findings highlight the importance of the inclusion of both women and men in strategic, large-scale decisions for achieving gender equality at work.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Psychology

Reference53 articles.

1. An analysis of high school students’ participation in decision making mechanisms in terms of gender;Acar Erdol;Educ. Sci.,2018

2. Medarbetares inflytande och delaktighet: HR-medarbetare om medbestämmande och MBL år 2021;Alm;Ratio,2022

3. Hur kan arbetsmiljön bli bättre för både kvinnor och män? [How can the working environment be better for both women and men?]2017

4. Participation in decision-making and work outcomes: evidence from a developing economy;Behravesh;Emp. Relat. Int. J.,2021

5. Participative decision-making: an integration of multiple dimensions;Black;Hum. Relat.,1997

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3