Author:
Wei Jianwen,Li Shuanglong,Han Yang,Fu Wangqian
Abstract
China is experiencing high social inequality accompanying influential education reforms. The Independent Freshmen Admission (IFA) policy was one of the multiple strategies in higher education reforms in China against the social context of high social inequality and the expansion of higher education. By comparing students admitted through IFA with those admitted by the National College Entrance Examination (NCEE), we examined how family advantages contributed to higher education inequality in terms of educational opportunity, process, and results. Using data from an elite university in Beijing, we found that: (1) Family advantages improved a student’s likelihood of being admitted through IFA, exhibiting opportunity inequality. (2) No significant difference in academic grades existed between the students admitted through IFA and NCEE. In comprehensive quality, however, those recruited through IFA performed significantly better than those admitted through NCEE. (3) Family social capital not only increased the likelihood of students being admitted through IFA but also, through direct and indirect effects, increased their comprehensive quality performance in terms of receiving student association and social practice awards.
Funder
National Social Science Fund of China
Reference58 articles.
1. Analysis on the efficiency of the autonomy admission of higher education: a perspective of fairness and efficiency.;Bao;Res. Educ. Dev.,2012
2. Social network capital of the Chinese family.;Bian;Tsinghua Sociol. Rev.,2002
3. The school as a conservative force: Scholastic and cultural inequalities;Bourdieu;Contemporary Research in the Sociology of Education,1974
4. The forms of capital;Bourdieu;Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education,1986
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献