Author:
Bartlett Georgina,Gawrylowicz Julie,Frings Daniel,Albery Ian P.
Abstract
Memory conformity may occur when a person’s belief in another’s memory report outweighs their belief in their own. Witnesses might be less likely to believe and therefore take on false information from intoxicated co-witnesses, due to the common belief that alcohol impairs memory performance. This paper presents an online study in which participants (n = 281) watched a video of a mock crime taking place outside a pub that included a witness either visibly consuming wine or a soft drink. Participants then read a statement from the witness that varied in the number of false details it contained before being asked to recall the crime. We found that the intoxicated witness was regarded as significantly less credible, but participants were not less likely to report misinformation from them. This suggests that intoxication status impacts one’s perception of how credible a source is, but not one’s ability to reject false suggestions from this source. Our findings reinforce the importance of minimizing co-witness discussion prior to interview, and not to assume that people automatically (correctly or not) discount information provided by intoxicated co-witnesses.
Reference42 articles.
1. Witnesses’ memory for events and faces under elevated levels of intoxication;Altman;Memory,2018
2. Partner characteristics and social contagion: does group composition matter?;Andrews;Appl. Cogn. Psychol.,2014
3. The intoxicated co-witness: effects of alcohol and dyadic discussion on memory conformity and event recall;Bartlett,2021
4. Intoxicated eyewitnesses: Better than their reputation?;Compo,2012
5. Intoxicated witnesses: testing the validity of the alcohol myopia theory;Crossland;Appl. Cogn. Psychol.,2016