Why Do We Take Risks? Perception of the Situation and Risk Proneness Predict Domain-Specific Risk Taking

Author:

de-Juan-Ripoll Carla,Chicchi Giglioli Irene Alice,Llanes-Jurado Jose,Marín-Morales Javier,Alcañiz Mariano

Abstract

Risk taking (RT) is a component of the decision-making process in situations that involve uncertainty and in which the probability of each outcome – rewards and/or negative consequences – is already known. The influence of cognitive and emotional processes in decision making may affect how risky situations are addressed. First, inaccurate assessments of situations may constitute a perceptual bias in decision making, which might influence RT. Second, there seems to be consensus that a proneness bias exists, known as risk proneness, which can be defined as the propensity to be attracted to potentially risky activities. In the present study, we take the approach that risk perception and risk proneness affect RT behaviours. The study hypothesises that locus of control, emotion regulation, and executive control act as perceptual biases in RT, and that personality, sensation seeking, and impulsivity traits act as proneness biases in RT. The results suggest that locus of control, emotion regulation and executive control influence certain domains of RT, while personality influences in all domains except the recreational, and sensation seeking and impulsivity are involved in all domains of RT. The results of the study constitute a foundation upon which to build in this research area and can contribute to the increased understanding of human behaviour in risky situations.

Funder

Horizon 2020

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España

Generalitat Valenciana

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Psychology

Reference110 articles.

1. nAch, risk-taking propensity, locus of control and entrepreneurship.;Ahmed;Pers. Individ. Differ.,1985

2. The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research.;Appelt;Judgm. Decis. Mak.,2011

3. Sexual risk-taking in gay men: the relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking.;Bancroft;Arch. Sex. Behav.,2003

4. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.;Bechara;Cognition,1994

5. The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers.;Bechara;Trends Cogn. Sci.,2005

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3