Sharing Data – Not With Us! Distrust as Decisive Obstacle for Public Authorities to Benefit From Sharing Economy

Author:

Nienaber Ann-Marie Ingrid,Woodcock Andree,Liotopoulos Fotis K.

Abstract

Future mobility planning to cope with ongoing environmental challenges such as air pollution has to be anchored in the work of every public authority worldwide. One recent trend that could support public authorities to meet the European Union’s sustainability targets is the creation and sharing of transport and mobility “big” data between public authorities via tools such as crowdsourcing. While the benefits of the use of big data to increase public authorities’ efficiency and effectivity and their citizens’ lives is well understood, examples from the public sector that highlight public authorities’ engagement in such sharing activities is still missing. To date relevant literature has highlighted issues around the capacity of public authorities that hinder shared activities. In this paper we want to raise distrust as a key reason for lack of engagement. Based on comprehensive data collected over the period of 4 years via several workshops and semi-structured interviews with seven public authorities in Europe, we are able to demonstrate that a major obstacle for not providing and sharing data via crowdsourcing for mutual benefit lies primarily in the hands of the public authority’s servants of the middle and high-level management. Our results show firstly, that distrust may emerge toward different referents such as the community, particular individuals, or the technology itself and thus, managerial implications have to be very specific to overcome distrust. Secondly, we show how distrust may spread from one referent to another through negative reciprocity and which, if unchecked may lead to an all-encompassing state that affects the whole sharing economy framework and inhibits potential benefits.

Funder

Horizon Foundation

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Psychology

Reference75 articles.

1. Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation.;Abramson;J. Abnorm. Psychol.,1978

2. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper.;Barriball;J. Adv. Nurs.,1994

3. Distrust in the balance: the emergence and development of intergroup distrust in a court of law.;Bijlsma-Frankema;Organ. Sci.,2015

4. Beyond Zipcar: collaborative consumption.;Botsman;Harv. Bus. Rev.,2010

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Trust, Distrust and Control Interplay in Interorganizational Relations;European Management Studies;2023-07-12

2. Use of blockchain in the agri-food value chain: State of the art in Spain and some lessons from the perspective of public support.;Telecommunications Policy;2023-07

3. Why is There a Need to Develop Capacity in Local Authorities;Capacity Building in Local Authorities for Sustainable Transport Planning;2023

4. Conclusions;Capacity Building in Local Authorities for Sustainable Transport Planning;2023

5. Mapping the big data analytics in sharing economy: A bibliometric literature review;Frontiers in Environmental Science;2022-11-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3