Performance of the clinical assessment scale for autoimmune encephalitis in a pediatric autoimmune encephalitis cohort

Abstract

BackgroundThe Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE), a new scale used for rating the severity of autoimmune encephalitis (AE), has demonstrated good validity and reliability in adults with AE, but there is a shortage of data on its performance in children with AE. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the CASE in a cohort of children with AE.MethodsForty-seven pediatric inpatients with AE who visited Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital between January 1, 2017, and October 31, 2021, were enrolled in the study. The CASE and mRS scores were obtained through a review of detailed medical records from the Health Information System by two pediatric neurologists. Finally, the performance of the CASE in this pediatric AE cohort was analyzed.ResultsThe results showed that anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis was the most common (61.70%) type of AE in children. The most common clinical manifestations were language problems (85.1%), psychiatric symptoms (80.9%), and dyskinesia/dystonia (78.7%). The CASE had good item reliability and interevaluator reliability; the Cronbach’s alpha value of the total score was 0.825, and the intraclass correlation (ICC) was 0.980. The Cronbach’s alpha value by item ranged from 0.16 to 0.406; items 1 and 9 had the lowest and highest Cronbach’s alpha values, respectively. The criterion validity between CASE and mRS total scores, as quantified by Pearson correlation, was 0.459, indicating slight to good criterion validity. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.992 (95% confidence interval: 0.974-1.00). A cutoff value of 14 was selected to determine whether a patient needed admission to the ICU; this cutoff had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92%. The changes in EEG, MRI, and antibody titers were not related to the severity of AE. A CASE score cutoff of 9 was selected to indicate whether second-line treatment would be needed.ConclusionThe CASE has good reliability and validity in children with AE; however, some items of the CASE may not apply to this population. Thus, an in-depth study of the CASE is needed in children with AE.