Blood cell counts can predict adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundCancer is concerning owing to its high mortality rate. Consequently, methods of prolonging the life of patients with cancer have become the primary focus of attention research. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have achieved good clinical efficacy as antitumor drugs; however, their severe adverse effects have made their use challenging. In order to clarify the predictors of adverse effects, scientists have conducted a series of studies. Blood counts can potentially monitor risk factors associated with the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Herein, a meta-analysis was performed to clarify further the guiding significance of blood counts in the clinical setting.MethodsStudies that satisfied the inclusion criteria were obtained by searching the database. Included studies were those in which irAEs had been observed, and evidence of an association between blood counts and irAEs was reported. The included ones were evaluated for quality. In addition to sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis, a meta-analysis was performed using the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study.ResultsA total of 18 articles were included in our study. The analyses were performed separately according to different blood cell count indicators. The blood cell count metrics associated with irAEs were: absolute eosinophil count, neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio, and platelet: lymphocyte ratio.ConclusionOur review and meta-analysis of studies suggest that absolute eosinophil count, neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio, and platelet: lymphocyte ratio may serve as predictors of the emergence of irAEs. Given the small number of studies focusing on the relationship between patient blood cell counts and the risk of irAEs, future studies need to further explore the mechanisms of occurrence and potential associations.