Abstract
The goal of this article is to revive and empirically expand the debate on institutional frameworks within commons scholarship. The paper's guiding question is: what kind of institutional framework allows for sustainable commoning in urban conditions? In order to answer this question, we invoke the case of Savings and Credit Associations, a form of financial commoning whereby participants lend each other money and decide, through deliberative sessions, how the money is to be shared. We mobilize data from three decades of ethnographic research in India and The Netherlands, in order to distill the institutional properties that have contributed to Savings and Credit Associations' sustainable existence. The paper's main claim will be that in Savings and Credit Associations' institutional frameworks, a pivotal precondition for sustainable commoning can be found: the combination of a socio-relational (low-scale, trust-based) approach with a reconsideration of the rules at given intervals. In conclusion, we also argue that it's precisely a socio-relational approach which may save commoning's emancipatory potential.
Reference55 articles.
1. Embros: twelve thoughts on the rise and fall of performance practice on the periphery of Europe;Argyropoulou;Perform. Res.,2012
2. Social movements as constituent power: the Italian struggle for the commons;Bailey;Indiana J. Global Legal Stud.,2013
3. Banking on each other: the situational logic of rotating savings and credit associations,;Biggart,2001
4. Indigenous savings and credit societies in the third world;Bouman;Dev. Dig.,1978
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献