Legalizing illegalities? Land titling and land tenure security in informal settlements
-
Published:2023-04-27
Issue:
Volume:5
Page:
-
ISSN:2624-9634
-
Container-title:Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Front. Sustain. Cities
Author:
Bwalya Umar Bridget,Kapembwa Julius,Kaluma Ketiwe,Siloka Lawrence,Mukwena Dipuo
Abstract
This study investigated how land rights formalization had affected land tenure security among landowners in two informal settlements of Lusaka and Chongwe districts, Zambia. It explored how social norms on land inheritance, decision making over land, marital trust and land related conflicts had been affected by the changed nature of land rights. Data was collected through a questionnaire survey of all the 302 households that had obtained title deeds at the time of the survey, two 3-in-1 focus group discussions and four key informant interviews. Results suggest that land tenure security is now a reality for residents that hitherto lived under constant threat of eviction. Landowners have benefitted from the formalization initiative through land laws and local norms that allow equitable access to land. Land rights formalization has curtailed land rights for secondary claimants such as extended family members, in preference for man, spouse and biological children. A sense of ownership undisputedly increased for men and women in the two study sites. About 50% of the respondents in both study sites indicated that formalization of land rights had not resulted in family conflicts. At least one-third from both sites reported an increase in love and trust between spouses after land rights formalization. About half of the respondents reported that no change in decision-making authority had occurred for men while 42% reported an increase. Formalizing land rights in informal settlements has entailed legalizing illegalities as regulations on plot boundaries are set aside by the state to achieve its aspirations of providing land tenure security to poor urbanites who would not otherwise have recourse to legal or regularized land. We recommend that caution be taken in promoting what is unarguably a pro-poor initiative to ensure that such initiatives should not incentivize future land encroachments.
Funder
United States Agency for International Development
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Subject
Public Administration,Urban Studies,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference86 articles.
1. Toward freedom from domestic violence: the neglected obvious;Agarwal;J. Hum. Develop. Capabil,2007
2. “Making sure land tenure counts for millennium development goals and national policy: evidence from Zambia,”;Ali,2019
3. Gendered land rights, legal reform and social norms in the context of land fragmentation—a review of the literature for Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda;Andersson Djurfeldt;Land Use Policy,2020
4. Gendered land rights and access to land in countries experiencing declining farm size;Andersson Djurfeldt;AgriFoSe2030 Rep,2018
5. “Women and land arrangements in Rwanda,”;Ansoms,2008
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献