Brief research report: Photoplethysmography pulse sensors designed to detect human heart rates are ineffective at measuring horse heart rates

Abstract

This study sought to evaluate the accuracy of a PPG (photoplethysmography) sensor designed to measure human heart rates in monitoring the distal limb pulse of healthy adult horses. We hypothesized that the PPG sensor is sensitive to placement location and orientation, and that measurement accuracies depend on placement and orientation on the limb. To evaluate this hypothesis, a completely randomized block design with a factorial treatment structure was used. Horses were considered as the block. Limb type (right front, left front, right hind, and left hind) and position of sensor (medial or lateral) were treatments, with levels arranged in a complete (4x2) factorial design. Data were collected by placing the PPG sensor on the limb of each horse (n = 6), with placement location according to the treatment (limb type and location) combination, and taking pulse readings for 60 seconds. Manual heart rates were collected concurrently using a stethoscope. Data were analyzed by calculating root mean square errors (RMSE) for the PPG measurements with the manual heart rates as a gold standard. Variation in RMSE associated with limb and location of sensor were evaluated using a general linear model with fixed effects for limb and location and a random effect for horse. Our results indicated that the PPG sensor was ineffective at measuring horse heart rates, and that the device was insensitive to placement location and orientation. Future work should focus on developing alternative analytics to interpret the data from PPG sensors to better reflect horse heart rates.