Cellular analysis and metagenomic next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in the distinction between pulmonary non-infectious and infectious disease

Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of the current study was to investigate the clinical value of cellular analysis and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in differentiating pulmonary non-infectious and infectious diseases in immunocompetent patients.MethodsThe present retrospective study was conducted from December 2017 to March 2020, and included immunocompetent patients with suspected pulmonary infection. High-resolution computed tomography, total cell counts and classification of BALF, conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), laboratory tests and mNGS of BALF were performed. Patients were assigned to pulmonary non-infectious disease (PNID) and pulmonary infectious disease (PID) groups based on final diagnoses. PNID-predictive values were analyzed via areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Optimal cutoffs were determined by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity.ResultsA total of 102 patients suspected of pulmonary infection were enrolled in the study, 23 (22.5%) with PNID and 79 (77.5%) with PID. The diagnostic efficiency of BALF mNGS for differentiating PID from PNID was better than that of CMTs. Neutrophil percentage (N%) and the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (N/L) in BALF were significantly lower in the PNID group than in the PID group. The AUCs for distinguishing PNID and PID were 0.739 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.636–0.825) for BALF N%, 0.727 (95% CI 0.624–0.815) for BALF N/L, and 0.799 (95% CI 0.702–0.876) for BALF mNGS, with respective cutoff values of 6.7%, 0.255, and negative. Joint models of BALF mNGS combined with BALF N/L or BALF N% increased the respective AUCs to 0.872 (95% CI 0.786–0.933) and 0.871 (95% CI 0.784–0.932), which were significantly higher than those for BALF mNGS, BALF N%, and BALF N/L alone.ConclusionsBALF N% ≤ 6.7% or BALF N/L ≤ 0.255 combined with a negative BALF mNGS result can effectively distinguish PNID from PID in immunocompetent patients with suspected pulmonary infection. BALF mNGS outperforms CMTs for identifying pathogens in immunocompetent patients, and the combination of mNGS and CMTs may be a better diagnostic strategy.