Performance of metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing and metagenomic Nanopore Sequencing for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients

Abstract

BackgroundPatients who were infected by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) could have weakened immunity that is complicated by opportunistic infections, especially for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). Notably, the HIV-MTB co-infection will accelerate the course of disease progress and greatly increase the mortality of patients. Since the traditional diagnostic methods are time-consuming and have low sensitivity, we aim to investigate the performance of mNGS (metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing) and mNPS (metagenomic NanoPore Sequencing) for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients.MethodsThe 122 HIV-infected patients were enrolled for the retrospective analysis. All of the patients underwent traditional microbiological tests, mNGS, and (or) mNPS tests. The clinical comprehensive diagnosis was used as the reference standard to compare the diagnostic performance of culture, mNGS, and mNPS on tuberculosis. We also investigate the diagnostic value of mNGS and mNPS on mixed-infection. Furthermore, the treatment adjustment directed by mNGS and mNPS was analyzed.ResultsCompared with the composite reference standard, the culture showed 42.6% clinical sensitivity and 100% specificity, and the OMT(other microbiological testing) had 38.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The mNGS had 58.6% clinical sensitivity and 96.8% specificity, and the mNPS had 68.0% clinical sensitivity and 100% specificity. The proportion of mixed-infection cases (88.9%) in the TB group was higher than those in the non-TB group (54.8%) and the mNGS and mNPS are more competitive on mixed-infection diagnosis compared with the traditional methods. Furthermore, there are 63 patients (69.2%) and 36 patients (63.2%) achieved effective treatment after receiving the detection of mNPS and mNGS, respectively.ConclusionOur study indicated that mNPS and mNGS have high sensitivity and specificity for TB diagnosis compared with the traditional methods, and mNPS seems to have better diagnostic performance than mNGS. Moreover, mNGS and mNPS showed apparent advantages in detecting mixed infection. The mNPS and mNGS-directed medication adjustment have effective treatment outcomes for HIV-infected patients who have lower immunity.