Author:
Juliebø-Jones Patrick,Tzelves Lazaros,Beisland Christian,Roth Ingunn,Somani Bhaskar K.
Abstract
IntroductionThe aim of this study was to perform an evaluation of patient experiences and perceptions regarding kidney stone surgery on the social media platform TikTok. An increasing number of the public use social media (SoMe) as a platform to share their views regarding their experiences related to surgical treatment.MethodsUsing the hashtag #kidneystonesurgery, the 100 most recent video posts as of 01.01.2024 on TikTok were included. As well as demographic data such as gender and location, thematic content was also collected. To achieve this, a previously published framework was used and adapted for application in the setting of kidney stone surgery. This was piloted on 20 sample videos to assess its feasibility before revision and establishment of the final framework. This included the following key areas: Pain, Complications, Anxiety, Recovery, Return to work, Finances, Treatment delays, Diet and Prevention and stent complaints.ResultsThe majority of posts (95%) were from North America, 80% by females and the mean number of video views was 92,826 (range: 261–2,000,000). 76% of the videos discussed ureteroscopy (URS). 49% were filmed at the hospital, which was named in 9% of the videos. Top three topics discussed were: Recovery (65%), pain (62%) and stents (55%). This was followed by anxiety (39%) and complications (24%). 12% of these videos uploaded by lay people included basic medical information that was wholly incorrect. More than half of the posts (51%) were negative in tone. Treatment delays (5%) and a lack of sufficient preoperative information (4%) were also raised, that appeared to contribute to the negative reports. However, the main cause for negative tone owed to the 80% of the patients (n = 44) who discussed stents that focused their video on the pain suffered from the post operative stent.ConclusionThere is a high level of usership and engagement on TikTok on the subject of kidney stone surgery. The proportion of negative videos is high and much of this is related to the bothersome stent symptoms and complications. This could easily lead to misperceptions among potential patients about the true burden of such adverse events.
Reference20 articles.
1. Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review;Geraghty;J Endourol,2017
2. Burden of urolithiasis: trends in prevalence, treatments, and costs;Raheem;Eur Urol Focus,2017
3. Measuring quality of life in patients with kidney stone disease: is it the future in endourology?;Vo;Curr Opin Urol,2024
4. Unveiling the impact of stone disease: enhancing quality of life through comprehensive care;Esperto;Minerva Urol Nephrol,2023
5. Quality of life of patients with stone disease: timing, planning, strategies, and prevention of a systemic pathology;Esperto;Minerva Urol Nephrol,2023
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献