Ureteroscopy Is Equally Efficient and Safe in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Wang Wei,Gao XiaoShuai,Peng Liao,Jin Tao

Abstract

BackgroundUreteroscopy (URS) has been established as an effective treatment for stones in obese patients (OP). However, recent studies found that the efficacy of the procedure may be lower in patients with higher body mass index (BMI). In the current study, we aim to determine if obesity might influence the effectiveness and safety of URS.MethodsIn May 2021, a comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov to find eligible studies. Stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, length of stay, and complication rate were assessed utilizing RevMan 5.3.ResultsThirteen studies involving 4,583 normal-weight patients (NWP), 2,465 OP, and 291 morbidly OP (MOP) were included. Pooled results showed that statistically similar SFR existed between OP and NWP [odds ratio (OR): 1.09; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.52; p = 0.59], and between MOP and NWP (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.46, 2.31; p = 0.95). The operation time was similar between OP and NWP [mean difference (MD): −2.27; 95% CI: −8.98, 4.43; p = 0.51], and between MOP and NWP (MD: 4.85; 95% CI: −5.78, 15.47; p = 0.37). In addition, no significant difference regarding length of stay existed between OP and NWP (MD: −0.07; 95% CI: −0.20, 0.07; p = 0.33), and between MOP and NWP (MD: −0.06; 95% CI: −0.25, 0.14; p = 0.58). Furthermore, we observed similar minor complication rate between OP and NWP (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.32; p = 0.78), and between MOP and NWP (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.80, 2.08; p = 0.30). The differences concerning major complication rate between OP and NWP (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.39, 2.43; p = 0.95), and between MOP and NWP (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.55, 7.30; p = 0.29) were also not significant.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that URS performed in MOP and OP appears to have the same efficacy and safety as well as in NWP group.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3