Surgical outcomes of spinal cavernous malformations: A retrospective study of 98 patients

Abstract

ObjectiveSpinal cord cavernous malformation (SCCM) is a rare vascular lesion, and the treatment strategy remains controversial at present. The goal of this retrospective study was to analyze the surgical outcomes of the SCCM and to find more appropriate treatment strategies for a better prognosis.MethodA retrospective review of 98 patients with SCCM from 2009 to 2018 was conducted at the neurosurgical center of our hospital. Neurological function was assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Clinical features were analyzed using the multivariable logistic regression.ResultsNinety-eight patients with SCCM were included, of whom 36% were female and 64% male. The mean age was 41.6 years; and family history was reported in 8% of patients. Definite hemorrhage was found in 6%. Before surgery, the neurological status was Grade A in 2%, Grade B in 2%, Grade C in 12%, Grade D in 54%, and Grade E in 30% of the patients. 83% (81/98) patients had long-term follow-up, of whom, 42% had improved, 51% were stable and 7% had deteriorated. Patients with dorsal or superficial lesions showed better improvement than those with ventral or lateral deep lesions. Those with symptoms lasting less than three months had higher rates of improvement than those with symptoms lasting more than three months. However, there was no significant difference in prognosis between hemilaminectomy and laminectomy.ConclusionThese results suggest that surgical strategies should be preferred for severe symptomatic SCCMs if total resection can be achieved, thereby avoiding the risk of severe complications with subsequent lesion hemorrhage. Earlier (usually within 3 months of symptom duration) surgical resection generally may lead to a better prognosis. For ventral or lateral deep SCCMs, the surgical strategy should be considered more carefully.