Alignment analysis of Brainlab knee 3 navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty using the adjusted mechanical method

Abstract

PurposeWith the application of navigation technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), TKA procedures have become various. Studies have shown that navigation can improve the alignment of patients' lower limbs. To verify this conclusion, we collected the clinical data from patients who underwent Brainlab knee 3 navigation-guided TKA. Brainlab knee 3 is a completely new software that takes a different approach to address the current challenges of navigated TKA. During the procedure, we applied the Adjusted Mechanical Alignment (AMA) principle and took soft tissue balance as a priority. We aim to explore the patients’ lower limb alignment changes who underwent the Brainlab knee 3 navigation-guided TKA using the AMA method.MethodsFifty consecutive patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty using the Brainlab knee3 knee navigation system (Smith&Nephew) from January to August 2021 by the same doctor (Yunsu Chen) in the Department of Joint Surgery of the Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital were included. Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKAA), anatomic Femur Tibia Angle (FTA), Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA) were measured on preoperative and postoperative full-length lower-limbs x-ray films or weight-bearing anterior and lateral knee radiographs for observational and descriptive study. The preoperative and postoperative knee alignment changes were analyzed through paired t-test or nonparametric Wilcoxon test using SPSS 25.0 softwareResultsPre-operative and post-operative HKAA both obeyed normal distribution. The mean preoperative HKAA was 169.8° (154.9–178.7°) with a standard deviation of 5.41; the postoperative HKAA was 175.7° (168.4–180.0°) with a standard deviation of 2.81. Using the two-sample paired t-test to analyze, the result showed P = 0.000 < 0.05; a statistically significant difference exists. The preoperative and postoperative FTA obeyed normal distribution as well. The mean preoperative FTA was 174.7° (163.4–179.9°) with a standard deviation of 3.90; postoperative 175.6° (167.0–179.9°) with a standard deviation of 2.77. Using the two-sample paired t-test to analyze, the result showed P = 0.140 > 0.05, the difference was not statistically significant. The preoperative LDFA was normally distributed, while postoperative LDFA was not. The mean preoperative LDFA was 90.7° (83.5–99.6°) with a standard deviation of 3.83; the median of postoperative LDFA was 91.6° (86.0–103.2°) with an interquartile range of 2.93. Using the two-sample paired Wilcoxon test, the result showed P = 0.052 > 0.05; the difference was not statistically significant. Preoperative MPTA obeyed normal distribution, while postoperative MPTA did not. The mean preoperative MPTA was 83.5° (72.7–92.9°), with a standard deviation of 3.66; the median of postoperative MPTA was 89.3° (84.6–95.6°), with an interquartile range of 1.45. Using the two-sample paired Wilcoxon test, the result shows P = 0.000 < 0.05; a statistically significant difference exists.ConclusionIn our study, AMA alignment was applied in Brainlab Knee3 computer navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. The femoral and tibial osteotomy angles were minimally adjusted according to soft tissue situations to reduce soft tissue release. We found AMA alignment provides good control of knee alignment in the coronal plane of the lower limbs, which is a reliable technique.