Author:
Walter Nike,Baertl Susanne,Lang Siegmund,Szymski Dominik,Weber Johannes,Alt Volker,Rupp Markus
Abstract
BackgroundAntimicrobial coating of intramedullary nails with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement promises infection control and stabilization for subsequent bone healing. However, when removing the implant, bone cement can debond and remain in the medullary cavity of the long bones, representing a nidus for reinfection. This work presents a technique comprising reinforcement of PMMA-coated intramedullary nails with cerclage wire to prevent such problems in patients treated for fracture-related infection (FRI) or knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with a static spacer as temporary arthrodesis allowing weight-bearing in the implant-free interval. Outcomes of this surgical treatment were evaluated in terms of (i) associated complications and (ii) patient-reported quality of life.MethodsIn this retrospective case series, 20 patients with PJI (n = 14, 70%) and FRI (n = 6, 30%) treated with PMMA-coated intramedullary nails reinforced with cerclage wire between January 2021 and July 2021 were included. Quality of life during the implant-free interval was evaluated with the EQ-5D, SF-36, and an ICD-10 based psychological symptom rating and compared with previously analyzed cohorts of successfully treated PJI and FRI patients in whom eradication of infection and stable bone consolidation was achieved.ResultsComplications during the implant-free interval comprised a broken nail in one case (5.0%) and a reinfection in one case (5.0%). Coating-specific side effects and cement debonding during removal did not occur. The mean physical health component score of SF-36 was 26.1 ± 7.6, and the mean mental health component score reached a value of 47.1 ± 18.6. The mean EQ-5D index value was 0.36 ± 0.32 and the mean EQ-5D visual analogue scale rating was 47.4 ± 19.4. The scores were significantly lower than those in the successfully treated FRI cohort but not in the PJI cohort. The mean ICD-10-based symptom rating scores revealed psychological symptom burden on the depression scale and enhanced levels of anxiety in comparison with healed FRI and PJI patients.ConclusionReinforcement of PMMA bone cement-coated implants seems to be a reasonable treatment option to create a temporary arthrodesis, preventing detachment of the bone cement when the implant was removed.Level of Evidence: IV.
Reference47 articles.
1. Uber die Depotwirkung einiger Antibiotica bei Vermischung mit dem Kunstharz Palacos;Buchholz;Chirurg,1970
2. Prevention of infection in open fractures: Where are the pendulums now?;Rupp;Injury,2020
3. Antimicrobial coated implants in trauma and orthopaedics – a clinical review and risk-benefit analysis;Alt;Injury,2017
4. Antibiotic cement-coated plates for management of infected fractures;Conway;Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ),2015
5. Intramedullary infections treated with antibiotic cement rods: preliminary results in nine cases;Paley;J Orthop Trauma,2002
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献