Young patients show poor efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor combined therapy in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers

Author:

Wang Yingnan,Zhang Shasha,Zhang Fengbin,Wang Lei,Wu Chensi,Zhang Xiaoyun,Zhang Ruixing,Guo Zhanjun

Abstract

BackgroundThe impact of age on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy remains controversial. The previous studies simply classified patients into younger and older groups, which might not reflect the real impact of young age on immunotherapy efficacy. The current study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined therapy in young (aged 18–44 years), middle-aged (aged 45–65 years), and old (aged >65 years) patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancers (GICs), and further determine the role of immunotherapy in young patients.MethodsPatients with metastatic GIC including esophageal cancer (EC), gastric cancer (GC), hepatocellular cancer (HCC), and biliary tract cancer (BTC) who received ICI combination therapy were enrolled, divided into young (aged 18–44 years), middle-aged (aged 45–65 years), and old (aged >65 years) groups. The clinical characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared among three groups.ResultsA total of 254 patients were finally included, with 18, 139, and 97 cases in the young (aged 18–44 years), middle-aged (aged 45–65 years), and old (aged >65 years) groups, respectively. Compared to middle-aged and old patients, young patients had lower DCR (all p < 0.05) and also had inferior PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.017). The multivariate analyses showed that young age was an independent prognostic factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 3.474, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.962–6.150, p < 0.001] and OS (HR 2.740, 95% CI 1.348–5.570, p = 0.005). Subsequent safety analyses referring to irAEs demonstrated no significant differences for distribution frequency among each age group (all p > 0.05), whereas patients with irAEs displayed better DCR (p = 0.035) and PFS (p = 0.037).ConclusionYounger GIC patients (aged 18–44 years) showed poor efficacy for ICI combined therapy, and irAEs could be used as a clinical biomarker to predict ICI efficacy in metastatic GIC patients.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference37 articles.

1. Global burden of 5 major types of gastrointestinal cancer;Arnold;Gastroenterology,2020

2. Epigenetic biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancers: the current state and clinical perspectives;Vedeld;Semin Cancer Biol,2018

3. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies: a review of current and future therapies;Hsu;R I Med J (2013),2020

4. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma;Finn;N Engl J Med,2020

5. KEYNOTE-590: phase III study of first-line chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab for advanced esophageal cancer;Kato;Future Oncol,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3