Initial experience with triple port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the feasibility and short-term clinical efficacy of triple-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TPLDG) with five-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (FPLDG).MethodsFrom April 2020 to December 2021, this retrospective study included all consecutive patients (n = 21) who underwent TPLDG + D2 lymph node dissection, and randomly screened patients who underwent FPLDG + D2 lymph node dissection during this period (n = 30).ResultsThere were no significant differences in intraoperative (P > 0.05) and postoperative complication rate (P = 0.635) between the two groups. The changes in the first ambulation, flatus, water intake after surgery and postoperative hospitalization were also similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, time to abdominal drainage tube removal (1.62 ± 0.15 days vs. 2.00 ± 0.12 days, P = 0.046), NRS pain score on the first postoperative day (1.91 ± 0.15 days vs. 2.47 ± 0.12 days, P = 0.004) and hemameba level on the third postoperative day (7.89 ± 0.51 days vs. 10.52 ± 0.58 days, P = 0.002) were significantly lower in the TPLDG group compared to the FPLDG group.ConclusionTPLDG is a safer, feasible, and short-term alternative to conventional LDG for distal gastric cancer.