Author:
Wang Fei,Wang Zi-ran,Ding Xue-song,Yang Hua,Guo Ye,Su Hao,Wan Xi-run,Wang Li-juan,Jiang Xiang-yang,Xu Yan-hua,Chen Feng,Cui Wei,Feng Feng-zhi
Abstract
BackgroundGestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a group of clinically rare tumors that develop in the uterus from placental tissue. Currently, its satisfactory curability derives from the timely and accurately classification and refined management for patients. This study aimed to discover biomarkers that could predict the outcomes of GTN patients after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsA total of 65 GTN patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into the good or poor outcome group and the clinical characteristics of the patients in the two groups were compared. Furthermore, the serum peptide profiles of all patients were uncovered by using weak cation exchange magnetic beads and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Feature peaks were identified by three machine learning algorithms and then models were constructed and compared using five machine learning methods. Additionally, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry was used to identify the feature peptides.ResultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) risk score was associated with poor outcomes. Eight feature peaks (m/z =1287, 2042, 2862, 2932, 2950, 3240, 3277 and 6626) were selected for model construction and validation by the three algorithms. Based on the panel combining FIGO risk score and peptide serum signatures, the neural network (nnet) model showed promising performance in both the training (AUC=0.9635) and validation (AUC=0.8788) cohorts. Peaks at m/z 2042, 2862, 2932, 3240 were identified as the partial sequences of transthyretin, fibrinogen alpha chain (FGA), beta-globin and FGA, respectively.ConclusionWe combined FIGO risk score and serum peptide signatures using the nnet method to construct the model which can accurately predict outcome of GTN patients after first-line chemotherapy. With this model, patients can be further classified and managed, and those with poor predicted outcomes can be given more attention for developing treatment failure.