Prognostic Efficacy of Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Women With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Abstract

BackgroundTumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has been suggested as an emerging prognostic predictor in women with breast cancer. However, previous studies evaluating the association between TSR and survival in women with breast cancer showed inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the possible prognostic role of TSR in breast cancer.MethodsRelevant cohort studies were obtained via search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A random-effects model, which incorporated the potential heterogeneity, was used to pool the results.ResultsTwelve cohort studies with 6175 patients were included. Nine of the 12 studies used 50% as the cutoff to divide the patients into those with stroma-rich (low TSR) and stroma-poor (high TSR) tumors. Pooled results showed that compared women with stroma-poor tumor, those with stroma-rich tumor were associated with worse survival outcomes (disease-free survival [DFS]: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32 to 1.85, P < 0.001; overall survival [OS]: HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.46 to 1.91, P < 0.001; and cancer-specific survival [CSS]: HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.20, P < 0.001). Analysis limited to women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed consistent results (DFS: HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.59 to 2.71, P < 0.001; OS: HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.73, P < 0.001; and CSS: HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.52 to 3.78, P < 0.001).ConclusionsCurrent evidence from retrospective studies supports that tumor TSR is a prognostic predictor or poor survival in women with breast cancer.