The Comparative Outcomes of Particulate Versus Coil Preoperative Embolization for Carotid Body Tumors

Abstract

Till now, the effect of different embolic materials (particulate vs coil) on pre-embolization of carotid body tumors remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to explore the comparative results between particulate and coil embolization for carotid body tumors. Thirty-seven patients with carotid body tumors who underwent embolization before surgical resection were reviewed and analyzed in this retrospective study between 2008 and 2020. Twenty-one patients were included in the particulate group, while 16 patients were included in the coil group. All procedure-related details, complications and 5-year follow-up data were collected in the study. The preoperative embolization time was obviously longer in the particulate group than in the coil group (42.6 ± 12.3 min vs. 33.7 ± 10.1 min, P =.02), and the fluo time of the procedure (864.5 ± 240.9 s vs. 729.6 ± 251.5 s) and cumulative air kerma (634.6 ± 188.4 mGy vs. 486.7 ± 164.7 mGy) value were higher in the particulate group (P =.01). The incidences of total adverse events in both groups were not significantly different (28.6% vs. 25.0%, P >.05); however, two cases of ectopic embolization only occurred in the particulate group. Interestingly, medical expenditure was higher in the particulate group than in the coil group (P =.02). For the 3-year follow-up evaluation, recurrence and all-cause mortality were similar in both groups (P >.05). Preoperative embolization with coils could be relatively safe, have a lower radiation dosage and be cost-effective for the treatment of carotid body tumors.