Prognostic and diagnostic value of circRNA expression in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundCircular RNAs (circRNAs) are receiving increasing attention as novel biomarkers. Our goal was to investigate the diagnostic, clinicopathological, and prognostic utility of circRNAs in prostate cancer (PCa).MethodsRelevant literature was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circRNA expression. circRNAs’ clinical, pathological, and prognostic value was examined using pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs).ResultsThis meta-analysis included 23 studies, with 5 for diagnosis, 16 for clinicopathological parameters, and 10 for prognosis. For diagnostic value, the pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.82, 0.62, 2.17, 0.29, 7.37, and 0.81, respectively. Upregulation of carcinogenic circRNAs was associated with poor clinical parameters (Gleason score: OR = 0.222, 95% CI: 0.145–0.340; T classification: OR = 0.274, 95% CI: 0.175–0.430; lymph node metastasis: OR = 0.353, 95% CI: 0.175–0.716; tumor size: OR = 0.226, 95% CI: 0.099–0.518) and could predict poor survival outcomes (HR = 2.408, 95% CI: 1.559–3.720, p < 0.001). Conversely, downregulation of tumor-suppressor circRNAs was also associated with poor clinical parameters (Gleason score: OR = 1.689, 95% CI: 1.144–2.493; T classification: OR = 2.586, 95% CI: 1.779–3.762) and worse prognosis (HR = 1.739, 95% CI: 1.147–2.576, p = 0.006).ConclusionOur results showed that circRNAs might be useful biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of PCa.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021284785.