Dual-Branch Convolutional Neural Network Based on Ultrasound Imaging in the Early Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Abstract

The early prediction of a patient’s response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer treatment is crucial for guiding therapy decisions. We aimed to develop a novel approach, named the dual-branch convolutional neural network (DBNN), based on deep learning that uses ultrasound (US) images for the early prediction of NAC response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). This retrospective study included 114 women who were monitored with US during pretreatment (NAC pre) and after one cycle of NAC (NAC1). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual invasive carcinoma in the breast. For predicting pCR, the data were randomly split into a training set and test set (4:1). DBNN with US images was proposed to predict pCR early in breast cancer patients who received NAC. The connection between pretreatment data and data obtained after the first cycle of NAC was considered through the feature sharing of different branches. Moreover, the importance of data in various stages was emphasized by changing the weight of the two paths to classify those with pCR. The optimal model architecture of DBNN was determined by two ablation experiments. The diagnostic performance of DBNN for predicting pCR was compared with that of four methods from the latest research. To further validate the potential of DBNN in the early prediction of NAC response, the data from NAC pre and NAC1 were separately assessed. In the prediction of pCR, the highest diagnostic performance was obtained when combining the US image information of NAC pre and NAC1 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.939; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.907, 0.972; F1-score: 0.850; overall accuracy: 87.5%; sensitivity: 90.67%; and specificity: 85.67%), and the diagnostic performance with the combined data was superior to the performance when only NAC pre (AUC: 0.730; 95% CI: 0.657, 0.802; F1-score: 0.675; sensitivity: 76.00%; and specificity: 68.38%) or NAC1 (AUC: 0.739; 95% CI: 0.664, 0.813; F1-score: 0.611; sensitivity: 53.33%; and specificity: 86.32%) (p<0.01) was used. As a noninvasive prediction tool, DBNN can achieve outstanding results in the early prediction of NAC response in patients with LABC when combining the US data of NAC pre and NAC1.