Author:
Thompson Terri-Ann,Northcraft Dana,Carrión Fabiola
Abstract
Telehealth, one of the newest health innovations, has been promoted as a tool to enhance access to health care services in ways that center patient needs. However, integrating telehealth within an inequitable health system undermines its potential. This perspective highlights policies and practices that foster structural inequities and names their impact on the use and acceptability of telehealth for medication abortion among specific communities of color. Communities of color have a higher prevalence of abortion use but face many barriers, including financial and geographic barriers, to abortion access. Preliminary evidence on telehealth for medication abortion shows that it is highly acceptable, accommodating of patient needs, and may allow patients to access abortion care at earlier gestational ages. However, evidence during the COVID-19 pandemic shows that utilization of telehealth is lower among communities of color. We describe how systemic barriers, including regulations on or laws banning telehealth for medication abortion, disinvestments in digital access, and restrictions on public insurance coverage, could perpetuate lower utilization of telehealth for medication abortion care among communities of color. We call for systems changes that will remove these barriers and make this health care innovation available to all who may desire it.
Reference62 articles.
1. A reproductive justice history957
RossLJ
SolingerR
Oakland, CAUniversity of California PressReproductive Justice [Internet]2017
2. Population group abortion rates and lifetime incidence of abortion: United States, 2008–2014;Jones;Am J Public Health.,2017
3. Are higher unintended pregnancy rates among minorities a result of disparate access to contraception?;Troutman;Cont Rep Med.,2020
4. Abortion in the Lives of Women Struggling Financially: Why Insurance Coverage Matters
BoonstraHD
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献