Women's preconception psychological stress and birth outcomes in a fertility clinic: the EARTH study

Author:

Mínguez-Alarcón Lidia,Williams Paige L.,Souter Irene,Ford Jennifer B.,Hauser Russ,Chavarro Jorge E.

Abstract

BackgroundThe epidemiologic literature on women's perceived stress in relation to perinatal outcomes has been inconclusive and does not consider the preconception window of exposure.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether women's preconception perceived stress is related to live birth, gestational age, and birthweight in a cohort receiving fertility treatment.MethodsThis observational study included women seeking fertility care at the Massachusetts General Hospital (2004–2019). During preconception, women provided information on their psychological stress using the short version of the validated Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4). We used regression models to evaluate the associations of stress with live birth (N = 768 attempting to conceive) and perinatal outcomes (N = 413 live births) while adjusting for confounders. Stratified analyses by mode of conception [natural, intrauterine insemination (IUI), and IVF (in vitro fertilization)] and selected socioeconomic factors (race, education, and income) were also conducted.ResultsHigher psychological stress was negatively associated with the overall probability of live birth (adjusted RR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92, 0.98), particularly among women conceiving using IVF. However, we found no association between women's psychological stress and gestational age and birth weight in the overall analyses and also stratified by mode of conception. Similarly, we observed no differences in women's psychological stress with any of the measured outcomes by socioeconomic factors.DiscussionThese results highlight the importance of considering the preconception window and mode of conception when evaluating the relationship between women's preconception stress and live birth.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Reference52 articles.

1. Female subfertility;Evers;Lancet,2002

2. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century;Inhorn;Hum Reprod Update,2015

3. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys;Mascarenhas;PLoS Med,2012

4. Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982–2010;Mosher;Natl Health Stat Report,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3