Arrhythmia monitoring and outcome after myocardial infarction (BIO|GUARD-MI): a randomized trial

Author:

Jøns Christian,Bloch Thomsen Poul Erik,Riahi Sam,Smilde Tom,Bach Ulrich,Jacobsen Peter Karl,Táborský Miloš,Faluközy Jozsef,Wiemer Marcus,Christensen Per Dahl,Kónyi Attila,Schelfaut Dan,Bulava Alan,Grabowski Marcin,Merkely Béla,Nuyens Dieter,Mahajan Rajiv,Nagel Patrick,Tilz Roland,Malczynski Jerzy,Steinwender Clemens,Brachmann Johannes,Serota Harvey,Schrader Jürgen,Behrens Steffen,Søgaard Peter

Abstract

ObjectivesCardiac arrhythmias predict poor outcome after myocardial infarction (MI). We studied if arrhythmia monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) can improve treatment and outcome.DesignBIO|GUARD-MI was a randomized, international open-label study with blinded outcome assessment.SettingTertiary care facilities monitored the arrhythmias, while the follow-up remained with primary care physicians.ParticipantsPatients after ST-elevation (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation MI with an ejection fraction >35% and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥4 (men) or ≥5 (women).InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive an ICM in addition to standard post-MI treatment. Device-detected arrhythmias triggered immediate guideline recommended therapy changes via remote monitoring.Main outcome measuresMACE, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or acute unscheduled hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.Results790 patients (mean age 71 years, 72% male, 51% non-STEMI) of planned 1,400 pts were enrolled and followed for a median of 31.6 months. At 2 years, 39.4% of the device group and 6.7% of the control group had their therapy adapted for an arrhythmia [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.9, P < 0.0001]. Most frequent arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation, pauses and bradycardia. The use of an ICM did not improve outcome in the entire cohort (HR = 0.84, 95%-CI: 0.65–1.10; P = 0.21). In secondary analysis, a statistically significant interaction of the type of infarction suggests a benefit in the pre-specified non-STEMI subgroup. Risk factor analysis indicates that this may be connected to the higher incidence of MACE in patients with non-STEMI.ConclusionsThe burden of asymptomatic but actionable arrhythmias is large in post-infarction patients. However, arrhythmia monitoring with an ICM did not improve outcome in the entire cohort. Post-hoc analysis suggests that it may be beneficial in non-STEMI patients or other high-risk subgroups. Clinical Trial Registration[https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02341534], NCT02341534.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3