Author:
Schiefenhövel Fridtjof,Berger Christian,Penkova Liubov,Grubitzsch Herko,Haller Bernhard,Meyer Alexander,Heringlake Matthias,Sander Michael,Erb Joachim M.,Balzer Felix,Treskatsch Sascha
Abstract
PurposeThough a subgroup analysis has shown improved survival for patients suffering severely reduced ventricular function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, RCTs were not able to demonstrate overall beneficial effects of perioperative Levosimendan in cardiac surgery. This might be due to Levosimendan’s pharmacokinetics reaching a steady-state concentration only 4–8 h after administration. Thus, this study now analysed the influence of timing of Levosimendan administration on perioperative outcome in cardiac surgery patients preoperatively presenting with severely reduced ventricular function and therefore considered at high-risk for intra- or postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. We hypothesized that prolonged preoperative Levosimendan administration (“preconditioning”) would reduce mortality.MethodsAll adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2018 perioperatively receiving Levosimendan were included in this retrospective, observational cohort study (n = 498). Patients were stratified into 3 groups: Levosimendan started on the day prior to surgery (“preop”), Levosimendan started on the day of surgery (“intraop”) or post ICU admission (“postop”). After propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, outcomes defined according to proposed standard definitions for perioperative outcome research were compared between groups.ResultsAfter PSM, there were no significant differences in patients’ characteristics, comorbidities and type/priority of surgery between groups. Compared to intraop or postop Levosimendan treatment, preop treated patients had significantly lower in-hospital-mortality (preop vs. intraop. vs. postop = 16,7% vs. 33,3% vs. 42,3%), duration of mechanical ventilation and rate of continuous renal replacement therapy.ConclusionsProlonged preoperative treatment with Levosimendan of cardiac surgery patients preoperatively presenting with severely reduced left ventricular function might be beneficial in terms of postoperative outcome. Our results are in line with recent experts’ recommendations concerning the prolonged perioperative use of Levosimendan. We strongly recommend that future randomized trials include this “preconditioning” treatment as an experimental arm.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference35 articles.
1. Calcium sensitizers: what have we learned over the last 25 years?;Pollesello;Int J Cardiol,2016
2. Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomised double-blind trial;Follath;Lancet Lond Engl,2002
3. Safety and efficacy of a novel calcium sensitizer, levosimendan, in patients with left ventricular failure due to an acute myocardial infarction. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study (RUSSLAN);Moiseyev;Eur Heart J,2002
4. Clinical trials update from the American heart association: rEPAIR-AMI, ASTAMI, JELIS, MEGA, REVIVE-II, SURVIVE, and PROACTIVE;Cleland;Eur J Heart Fail,2006
5. Intravenous levosimendan vs. dobutamine in acute decompensated heart failure patients on beta-blockers;Bergh;Eur J Heart Fail,2010
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献