Left vs. right radial approach for coronary catheterization: Relation to age and severe aortic stenosis

Author:

Will Maximilian,Weiss Thomas W.,Weber Michael,Kwok Chun Shing,Borovac Josip A.,Lamm Gudrun,Unterdechler Markus,Aufhauser Simone,Nolan Jim,Mascherbauer Julia,Schwarz Konstantin

Abstract

BackgroundOld age and the presence of aortic stenosis are associated with the unfolding of the intrathoracic aorta. This may result in increased difficulties navigating catheters from the right compared to the left radial approach.ObjectiveTo investigate whether increasing age or presence of severe aortic stenosis was associated with increased catheterization success rates from left (LRA) compared to right radial artery approach (RRA).MethodsWe compared coronary angiography success rates of RRA and LRA according to different age groups and in a subgroup of patients with severe aortic stenosis.ResultsA total of 21,259 coronary angiographies were evaluated. With increasing age, the first pass success rate from either radial access decreased significantly (p < 0.001). In patients aged <85 years, there was no difference between LRA and RRA. However, in patients aged ≥85 years, LRA was associated with significantly higher success rates compared to RRA (90.1 vs. 82.8%, p = 0.003). Patients aged ≥85 years received less contrast agent and had shorter fluoroscopy time when LRA was used [86.6 ± 41.1 vs. 99.6 ± 48.7 ml (p < 0.001) and 4.5 ± 4.1 min vs. 6.2 ± 5.7 min (p < 0.001), mean (±SD)]. In patients with severe aortic stenosis (n = 589) better first pass success rates were observed via LRA compared to the RRA route (91.9 vs. 85.1%, p = 0.037).ConclusionLRA, compared to RRA, is associated with a higher first-pass catheter success rate for coronary artery angiography in patients aged ≥85 years and those with severe aortic stenosis.

Funder

Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. (2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation;Ibanez;Eur Heart J.,2018

2. (2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation;Collet;Eur Heart J.,2021

3. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes;Neumann;Eur Heart J.,2020

4. and Impact on Long-Term Survival Among 17,901 Patients Treated at the Mayo Clinic From 1994 to 2005;Incidence;JACC: Cardiovasc Interven.,2008

5. Low rate of conversion to transfemoral approach when attempting both radial arteries for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a study of 1,826 consecutive procedures;Guédès;J Invasive Cardiol.,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3