Radiological Knosp, Revised-Knosp, and Hardy–Wilson Classifications for the Prediction of Surgical Outcomes in the Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of Pituitary Adenomas: Study of 228 Cases

Author:

Araujo-Castro Marta,Acitores Cancela Alberto,Vior Carlos,Pascual-Corrales Eider,Rodríguez Berrocal Víctor

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate which radiological classification, Knosp, revised-Knosp, or Hardy–Wilson classification, is better for the prediction of surgical outcomes in the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal (EET) surgery of pituitary adenomas (PAs).MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients with PAs who underwent EET PA resection for the first time between January 2009 and December 2020. Radiological cavernous sinus invasiveness was defined as a Knosp or revised-Knosp grade >2 or a grade E in the Hardy–Wilson classification.ResultsA total of 228 patients with PAs were included. Cavernous sinus invasion was evident in 35.1% and suprasellar extension was evident in 74.6%. Overall, surgical cure was achieved in 64.3% of patients. Surgical cure was lower in invasive PAs than in non-invasive PAs (28.8% vs. 83.1%, p < 0.0001), and the risk of major complications was higher (13.8% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.003). The rate of surgical cure decreased as the grade of Knosp increased (p < 0.001), whereas the risk of complications increased (p < 0.001). Patients with Knosp 3B PAs tended to achieve surgical cure less commonly than Knosp 3A PAs (30.0% vs. 56.0%, p = 0.164). Similar results were observed based on the invasion and extension of Hardy–Wilson classification (stage A–C 83.1% vs. E 28.8% p < 0.0001, grade 0–II 81.1% vs. III–IV 59.7% p = 0.008). The Knosp classification offered the greatest diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of surgical cure (AUC 0.820), whereas the invasion Hardy–Wilson classification lacked utility for this purpose (AUC 0.654).ConclusionThe Knosp classifications offer a good orientation for the estimation of surgical cure and the risk of complications in patients with PAs submitted to EET surgery. However, the invasion Hardy–Wilson scale lacks utility for this purpose.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3