Author:
Finch Jessamine,Jasny Micah,Kucera Katherine F.,Kiefer Gretel
Abstract
First emerging at the end of the 20th century, community science (a.k.a. citizen science), utilizing volunteers and volunteer-contributed data, has become a major component of biological conservation worldwide. Interacting factors including limited funding, technology availability, and public interest present a unique opportunity for conservation scientists and practitioners to benefit from larger datasets with broader spatial and temporal reach than possible from professional researchers alone. In tandem with benefits to science, volunteers gain hands-on research experience, scientific knowledge, outdoor opportunities, and community. However, this approach is far from universally adopted, as some researchers question the accuracy and value of community science data and entrusting volunteers with sensitive data, such as rare plant locations. We assessed community science projects that conduct rare plant monitoring to examine the value of community science in plant conservation. We identified projects through research and targeted outreach. Through digital surveys of project managers and volunteers, we collected qualitative and quantitative data addressing the efficacy of projects in regard to a number of predictor variables (e.g., staffing, funding, program size, data management, volunteer training, and demographics) and metrics of success (e.g., number of volunteers engaged, monitoring assignments, and publications). We reported the qualities of successful plant conservation community science projects to encourage the establishment of new projects, the improvement of existing ones, and the maximum application of volunteer-contributed rare plant monitoring datasets. We propose the establishment of a community science rare plant monitoring network to facilitate sharing ideas, strategies, and tools for project success.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference68 articles.
1. The accuracy of citizen science data: A quantitative review;Aceves-Bueno;Bull. Ecol. Soc. America,2017
2. The UK flora programme of the millennium seed bank project: The outcome of a collaboration between volunteers and professionals;Alton;Plant Genet. Resour. Newslett.,2001
3. Organizationally based citizen science: considerations for implementation;Anderson;J. Sci. Communication.,2020
4. Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, transparency, and trust in citizen science;Anhalt-Depies;Biol. Conserv.,2019
5. Species monitoring2022
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献