Author:
Lu Yao,Ma Siyuan,Xia Chaoxu
Abstract
Following the earthquake, prompt evaluation of the distribution of coseismic landslides and estimation of potential disaster losses are crucial for emergency response and resettlement planning. The Luding earthquake of 2022 offers a valuable opportunity to conduct a rapid assessment of coseismic landslides using various models. In this study, we utilize the Logistic Regression (LR)-based Xu2019 model, a new-generation model developed in China, alongside the Newmark model to perform the rapid hazard assessment of coseismic landslides. Assessing the accuracy and applicability of these two models based on the coseismic landslides from the Luding earthquake, we find that within intensity area of IX, the high probability area identified by the Newmark model aligns closely with the actual distribution of landslides. However, the Newmark model’s prediction is overestimated in the intensity area of VIII. For the Xu2019 model, the prediction results are in good agreement with the distribution of actual landslides. Most landslides are located in high probability areas, such as Detuo town, Wandong, and Xingfu villages, indicating that the model has a higher prediction accuracy. Overall, two models have good practical utility in emergency hazard assessment of coseismic landslides. However, the Newmark model requires multi-input parameters and the assignment of these parameters will increase the uncertainty and subjectivity in the practical application of the modeling assessment.
Reference61 articles.
1. Improving near‐real‐time coseismic landslide models: lessons learned from the 2016 Kaikōura, New Zealand, Earthquake;Allstadt;Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,2018
2. Southeastward increase of the late Quaternary slip-rate of the Xianshuihe fault, eastern Tibet. Geodynamic and seismic hazard implications;Bai;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.,2018
3. Hazard and risk assessment of earthquake-induced landslides—case study;Bojadjieva;Landslides,2018
4. Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation;Brenning;Nat. Hazards and Earth Syst. Sci.,2005
5. A method for quick assessment of earthquake-triggered landslide hazards: a case study of the Mw6.1 2014 Ludian, China earthquake;Chen;Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.,2018