Author:
Adhikari Sujan Raj,Molnar Sheri,Wang Jinfei
Abstract
The goal of the multi-year seismic microzonation mapping project for Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, is to produce seismic hazard maps inclusive of local site effects, in particular seismic hazard specific to one-dimensional site response and three-dimensional Georgia sedimentary basin amplification, as well as liquefaction and landslide hazard potential. We explore the variability in key seismic site characterization measures most often used for seismic microzonation mapping to evaluate the impact on mapping and communication of seismic microzonation of Greater Vancouver. This study focuses on the comparison of seismic microzonation maps of Greater Vancouver based on up to three seismic site term parameters and their associated classification schemes: 1) the time-averaged shear-wave velocity (Vs) of the upper 30 m (Vs30) and associated Canadian National Building Code (NBC) site class; 2) Vs30-based site classification proposed for the updated Eurocode 8; 3) site period (T0) determined from microtremor site amplification spectra; and 4) a hybrid site classification based on T0 and the average Vs and thickness of soil. 810 Vs30 and 2,200 T0 values are determined to evaluate sub-regional differences in these important seismic site parameters in Greater Vancouver. We find that the seismic microzonation of Greater Vancouver depends on the chosen seismic site parameter (Vs30, T0, or a combination of parameters) and that classification schemes with greater class divisions are beneficial to communicating the great variability in seismic site conditions in Greater Vancouver. We recommend that either one hybrid classification map or two classification maps of Vs30 and T0 together are required for effective communication of the seismic microzonation of Greater Vancouver.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference55 articles.
1. A review of NBCC 2005 seismic hazard results for Canada—The interface to the ground and prognosis for urban risk mitigation
AdamsJ.
HalchukS.
2004
2. Region specific vs 30 across Metro Vancouver and impact to seismic design ground motions;Adhikari
3. Significance of geodatabase development for seismic microzonation in Metropolitan Vancouver, Canada;Adhikari
4. CPT-Vs correlations for post-glacial sediments in Metropolitan Vancouver;Assaf;Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.,2023
5. Seismic site characterization in Fraser River delta in metropolitan vancouver;Assaf;Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.,2022