Author:
Kholkine Leonid,Servotte Thomas,de Leeuw Arie-Willem,De Schepper Tom,Hellinckx Peter,Verdonck Tim,Latré Steven
Abstract
Professional road cycling is a very competitive sport, and many factors influence the outcome of the race. These factors can be internal (e.g., psychological preparedness, physiological profile of the rider, and the preparedness or fitness of the rider) or external (e.g., the weather or strategy of the team) to the rider, or even completely unpredictable (e.g., crashes or mechanical failure). This variety makes perfectly predicting the outcome of a certain race an impossible task and the sport even more interesting. Nonetheless, before each race, journalists, ex-pro cyclists, websites and cycling fans try to predict the possible top 3, 5, or 10 riders. In this article, we use easily accessible data on road cycling from the past 20 years and the Machine Learning technique Learn-to-Rank (LtR) to predict the top 10 contenders for 1-day road cycling races. We accomplish this by mapping a relevancy weight to the finishing place in the first 10 positions. We assess the performance of this approach on 2018, 2019, and 2021 editions of six spring classic 1-day races. In the end, we compare the output of the framework with a mass fan prediction on the Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG) metric and the number of correct top 10 guesses. We found that our model, on average, has slightly higher performance on both metrics than the mass fan prediction. We also analyze which variables of our model have the most influence on the prediction of each race. This approach can give interesting insights to fans before a race but can also be helpful to sports coaches to predict how a rider might perform compared to other riders outside of the team.
Funder
Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen
Reference40 articles.
1. A critical comparison of machine learning classifiers to predict match outcomes in the nfl;Beal;In. J. Comput. Sci. Sport,2020
2. A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms;Bentéjac;Artif. Intell. Rev,2021
3. The application of machine learning techniques for predicting results in team sport: a review;Bunker;ArXiv, abs/1912.11762,2019
4. Learning to rank with nonsmooth cost functions
BurgesC.
RagnoR.
LeQ.
SchölkopfB.
PlattJ.
HoffmanT.
MIT PressAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems192007
5. Learning to rank using gradient descent;Burges,2005
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献