Abstract
The drive to maximize food production in a sustainable manner is a paramount concern for farmers and governments. The aim of food producers is to maximize their production yield employing actions such as application of fertilizer or pesticide they believe help to achieve this aim. However, farms do not exist in isolation, but rather share a landscape with neighbors forming networks where any action taken by any one farmer affects their neighbors who are forced to take mitigating actions creating a complicated set of interactions. Understanding these [non-]cooperative interactions and their effect on the shared ecosystem is important to develop food security strategies while protecting the environment and allowing farmers to make a living. We introduce a simple competitive agent based model in which agents produce food that is sold at a fixed price (we ignore market dynamics and do not include explicit punishment on any agent). We analyzed agent's profits in several simple scenarios allowing us to identify the most advantageous set of actions for maximizing the yield (and thus profit) for each farmer. We show that the effect of the structure of the network on each farm has implications on the actions taken by agents. These results have implications for the understanding of the effects of farming practices on the environment and how different levels of cooperation between farmers, taking into account the local terrain, can be used to incentivise producers to minimise the effects on the environment while maximizing yields.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Statistics and Probability
Reference35 articles.
1. Brief history of agricultural systems modeling;Jones;Agric Syst,2017
2. On the development and use of farm models for policy impact assessment in the European Union-a review;Reidsma;Agric Syst,2018
3. Chapter 7: food security and food production systems485533
PorterJ
XieL
ChallinorA
CochraneK
HowdenS
IqbalM
CambridgeCambridge University PressFood security and food production systems. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Chan2014
4. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison;Rosenzweig;Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2014